REBLOG AND THEN CLICK ON THE PICTURE. USE YOUR WEBCAM OR NOT.
This is the most wondrous thing. I have turned off all of my lights and I’m sat under my duvet like a secret pioneer into this fantastic little world that I can’t stop watching.
Genuinely one of the coolest things I’ve come across on here.
Ok this is amazing
I spent like 20 minutes just watching it.
omg i dont reblog stuff but fhdbsjfhdbshjfs this needs to be on my tumblr omg //stares
Omfg, yes. It’s back!
yor smart, interesting and hot…get over it
So what you’re saying is, I deserved to be harassed by strangers because of how I look?
Cool story bro.
“yor” smart, interesting and hot, therefore you should not use your intellect or own sense dictate how you reasonably expect to be treated, but instead “get over” people overstepping boundaries in your personal space.
In celebration of my daughter’s birthday, I decided to give away a three sets of my wood paneling cupcake wrappers! (Each set includes 12 wrappers.) The giveaway is open to everyone, within the US or not, and it includes shipping. The giveaway will end on Tuesday, April 17th at midnight and the winner will be chosen on April 18th, my daughter’s birthday!
To win, you must reblog this post. Once this post has been reblogged, you can enter a second time by tweeting about the giveaway. Just make sure to add #NellieCakesGiveaway and your tumblr name to the tweet, otherwise it won’t be counted. (Also, make sure I can contact you via your tumblr ask box or through twitter!)
Feel free to check out the other stuff in my etsy shop too!
Om nom nom
Katter’s Australia Party - Campbell Newman/gay marriage attack ad
When even Bolt thinks you’ve crossed the line, you know you’re in trouble:
First, why freight the same sex marriage debate with pictures of gay men being physically intimate? The intention is plain and foul: to appeal to the yuck factor with homophobes. Would we illustrate a defence of traditional marriage with a couple of porn stars engaging in foreplay?
Second, why show a gay couple as a beautiful young man and an older and plainer one? Again, the intention seems plain: to link gay marriage or gay relationships generally to pedophilia - or at least to gay predators. Would we illustrate an argument on the sanctity of marriage by showing a 40-year-old groom with a teen bride?
Third, what’s with the creepy pixellation on the picture of the gays? The area being covered is a man’s chest, for goodness sake. Again, the intention is plain and foul: to make even the sight of a gay man’s chest seem sinister. To hint at the illicit and disgusting.
Fourth, what’s with the footage of Newman folding a skirt, after asking in this context: “How well do you really know Campbell Newman”? This time the intention is slightly less clear, even if the malice isn’t. Is this meant to sneer at gays as sissies? Or as Campbell as a closet gay - or even crossdresser?
AUSTRALIA, YOU’RE STANDING IN IT!!!
Seeya, dudes, I’m outta here!
The pixellation is because the original photos show the man on the left with a fake pregnant belly and breasts. The photographer was making a comment on gay adoption.
But yeah, Katter is an arse.
I think the fact that the graphics are on a slide show says it all really: Old and out of touch technology for an old and out of touch view on homosexuality.